Eminent panel to advise on system to assess sustainability and socio-political issues facing major energy and mining projects »

Critical Resource has established a senior advisory board to guide its LicenseSecure™ assessment system for natural resources projects. The board comprises:

           Lord (John) Browne - managing director at Riverstone, the private equity firm, and former group chief executive of BP.

           Bill Emmott - former editor of The Economist, and globally-respected commentator and consultant on international affairs

           Professor Paul Collier – professor of economics and director of the Centre for the Study of African Economies at Oxford University, and author of The Bottom Billion.

 

Critical Resource is an advisory firm specialising in sustainability and stakeholder issues, with a particular focus on the natural resources industries. The firm has developed LicenseSecure, a system for assessing the “health of the socio-political license to operate” for resource projects. This aims to facilitate far-sighted, responsible management of sustainability and stakeholder issues around such projects and is designed as a decision tool for senior executives of companies and major investors. The advisory board will provide high-level guidance to the development of LicenseSecure.

 

Critical Resource’s  aim is to assist clients to meet their business goals by managing these issues in a strategic, far-sighted and responsible way. Critical Resource is also a source of independent analysis and comment in this area.

 

A particular focus of expertise is the natural resources sector, including energy and mining, where such issues are often critical to business success. The team brings together broad experience from BP, Rio Tinto, McKinsey, The Economist, the OECD, Chatham House and elsewhere.

 

The LicenseSecure methodology provides a summary view based on a rating from AAA to D. This is assessed using a comprehensive and carefully designed set of criteria, and backed up by a detailed assessment to guide management or investor response. 

 

For companies, the assessment provides authoritative due diligence and a succinct, comprehensive overview of the ‘socio-political license to operate’, allowing strategic monitoring and response to risks and opportunities facing the project. For investors, a LicenseSecure rating can help reveal price-sensitive information not covered by standard valuation models, and signals in advance where projects face socio-political threats to value or reputation.

 

The role of the board is to provide input to the team on major, emerging socio-political trends to inform the development of LicenseSecure™ and also refinements of the methodology. Initial guidance in this respect will be provided during 2009. Excluded from the board’s role is providing guidance on the ratings of individual projects, and overseeing the day-to-day running of Critical Resource.

 

During his time at BP, Lord Browne was credited with its transformation into one of the most successful global energy firms. He also adopted far-sighted, and industry-leading, approaches to climate change and other corporate responsibility issues.

 

Emmott is author of Rivals: How the power struggle between China, India and Japan will shape our next decade. During his editorship of The Economist, from 1993 to 2006, its circulation more than doubled to almost 1.1 million worldwide.

 

Professor Collier is one of the world’s leading experts on African and resource-rich economies. He was formerly Director of the Development Research Group at the World Bank.

Mining comes to the aid of cholera sufferers in Southern Africa »

Mining, we all know, is an easy target for environmentalists and others who may have a very narrow view of the world and not apprecaite its importance to everyday life. We in the industry also know that the industry’s social efforts are in many cases second to none.

Anglo American’s response to the cholera epidemic in Zimbabwe (and now spreading into South Africa) caused by that inhuman meglomaniac Robert Mugabe is an excellent example of our caring industry.

Anglo American has pledged R 1 million to help the Cholera Relief Operation in both Zimbabwe and the Limpopo province as part of its “continued commitment to the health and welfare of our communities. “

The funds, to be donated from the Anglo American Chairman’s Fund, will be managed by the South African Red Cross Society (SARCS), which has long operated in these territories, and is in the process of implementing an extensive recovery plan.

Anglo’s donation will be used as part of the SARCS’ relief operation to facilitate medical treatment and to provide clothing, shelter, and food, as well as education to reduce and minimise infection.

In addition Anglo Coal’s eMalahleni Water Reclamation Plant will deliver 72 000 litres of potable water to the affected areas.
 
Kuseni Dlamini, Head of Anglo American South Africa and Chairman of the Anglo American Chairman’s Fund said: “Anglo is committed to supporting the communities in which it operates as well as to the health of its employees. We hope today’s donation to the Limpopo and Zimbabwe communities will help bring some immediate relief to the affected people.”

Anglo forced to defend sustainable investment in Zimbabwe »

Following media pressure in the UK and elsewhere, Anglo American has defended its investment in Zimbabwe. Anglo is to be commended on its position. Investment of this nature can be to the benefit of a great number of the country’s people, especially if that investment is controlled by a company like Anglo, a driver in the ICMM and a company with excellent sustainable development credentials. It would be wrong to cease such long-lead investments in the country. Zimbabwe will need projects like this to rebuild its economy once it rids itself of the Mugabe madman and returns to democracy.

It would be wrong for Anglo to pull out. This would hand an advanced mining project to Mugabe’s criminal regime. That would be double jeopardy, potentially increasing the regime’s access to foreign currency and depriving local communities of the potential benefits.

The following statement is Anglo American’s response to media reports relating to its business activity in Zimbabwe. “Anglo American has been an investor in Zimbabwe for 60 years.  The Unki platinum project in Zimbabwe, which has been in development since 2003, is a long-term investment for a mine which is yet to start production and will not generate revenues for some years. Anglo American is deeply concerned about the current political situation in Zimbabwe and condemns the violence and human rights abuses that are taking place.  Anglo American is monitoring the situation in Zimbabwe very closely and is reviewing all options surrounding the development of the project. It has been made clear to Anglo American that if it ceases to develop this project, the Government of Zimbabwe will assume control.

“Anglo American has a clear responsibility to protect the wellbeing of its more than 650 employees and contractors, as well as their families and all those who depend indirectly on the activity around the project, all of whose livelihoods would be jeopardised should the company withdraw from Zimbabwe. The responsible development of the Unki mine will create a long-term viable business which will be important to the economic future of Zimbabwe for years to come.  Anglo American continues to support the communities around the project with a number of important social development activities, including the provision of basic food and supplies, the building of a dam to help support agriculture through the reliable supply of water and the provision of financial and other assistance to the primary and secondary schools and community health facilities.  

“Anglo American is in full compliance with all relevant national and international laws relating to its activities in Zimbabwe.”

PERC 2008 – another resource code »

The Pan-European Reserves and resources Reporting Committee (PERC) was formed in 2006 to resume the work of the previous IMM Reserves Committee which had developed the original 1991 IMM Code, and to take responsibility for managing and updating the Reporting Code 2001 which had been developed under the aegis of the Committee for Mineral Reserves International Reporting Standards (CRIRSCO), with sponsorship from the Institute of Mining and Metallurgy (IMM), the European Federation of Geologists (EFG), the Geological Society, and the The Institute of Geologists of Ireland (IGI), for use in the UK and western Europe. PERC members represent its parent organisations as well as key sectors of the mining and financial communities in the UK and Europe more generally. The PERC Code 2008 has been developed as an update to incorporate improvements in the international CRIRSCO ‘template’ as well as details specific to the European extractive industries (such as for industrial minerals, dimension stone, and aggregates). It is a CRIRSCO-compliant Code and shares identical reserve and resource definitions with other Codes in the CRIRSCO family such as JORC, SAMREC, and CIM.

The “exposure draft” for consultation was launched on June 17, with a six-month consultation process leading to launch of the final version of the Code in mid-December 2008. There was lively discussion at the launch event in the Council Room at IOM3 (Institute of Materials Minerals and Mining), in London. Among the questions raised was the need for reporting standards for scoping, prefeasibility and feasibility studies. This is a question that has been well aired in these pages, first in the December 2007 issue and followed up in various issues thereafter. Readers are further encouraged to send us their opinions and ideas on study reporting standards.

To take part in the PERC discussions and give your opinions on that code go to

www.PERCreserves.com

 

 

Strata control debate - comments welcomed »

Professor Ernesto Villaescusa, Industry Chair in Mining Rock Mechanics, Western Australian School of Mines, Curtin University of Technology notes that he “read with interest the article entitled Strata control” in International Mining’s May issue. He comments: “Leading photo. It raises a lot of questions… For example if this would be a typical installation practice, the position of the operator leaves a lot to be desired. In unsupported ground, on a typical development face, it means that the operator is indeed exposed to instability from above.

“The statement ‘hard rocks mines are moving from mechanical to resin anchor bolts to improve ground support efficiency’ needs qualification. In Australia, most mines rely on frictional bolts and there is documented evidence of problems with the efficient installation of resin bolts.”

In the paper by Villaescusa E, et al, . Quantifying the performance of resin anchored rock bolts in the Australian underground hard rock mining industry. Int J Rock Mech Mining Sci (2007), doi:10.1016/j.ijrmms.2007.03.004, the authors conclude: “The overcoring data show that for the majority of the current bolt–hole size combinations, reinforcement systems and installation practices used in the Australian hard rock mining industry, the best resin mixing and bolt encapsulation occurs within the middle region of the bolt. In all cases of low load transfer, poor resin mixing was identified as the main cause. In addition, the majority of the overcored bolts had no resin at the collar region, indicating that effective plating of the bolts is very important for long-term effectiveness. The worst conditions in terms of encapsulation and load transfer are found towards the toe region of the bolts.”

Villaescusa continues: “However, the biggest issue I have is with the shotcrete section of this article.

“First of all, shotcrete does not provide active support ‘within minutes’, and the fibres are not designed to secure a ‘good bond’ with the rock. Most importantly, the suggestion that ‘most mining fatalities are caused by small stones weighting less than 1 kg’ is plainly wrong. This is a dangerous statement that is clearly designed to discredit the role of wire/chain link mesh in rock support (in favour of shotcrete). Our experience and research outcomes clearly show that mesh is a critical component of a ground support strategy, specially when deformations exceeding 50 mm are likely to be experienced when the shotcrete is no longer effective.

“Furthermore, the statement that TSL can be used as ‘a replacement for wire mesh’ is also not correct or scientifically justified. Our research shows that the current TSL products have serious force-displacement deficiences.”

John Chadwick responds: “Both Mike Rispin and I were able to discuss these points with Professor Villaescusa at the recent MassMin conference in Sweden and the other contributor to the shotcrete discussion has been made aware of Villaescusa’s points.

Michael Rispin, Head of Mining, UGC International, BASF Construction Chemicals Europe: “In response to Dr. Villaescusa’s concerns regarding the article, I will first and foremost address his concern with respect to the part on TSL as contributed by BASF. He and I had the opportunity to speak about this face-to-face at MassMin and I believe that we came amicably to an equilibrium regarding the issue and attributed it primarily to interpretation and semantics.

“The passage in the article reads: ‘Largely designed to be a rapidly applied, temporary ground support or as a replacement for wire mesh in conjunction with rock reinforcement, TSLs offer …’. We stand fully behind this statement.

“The interpretation of the effectiveness of TSL or that of wire mesh is not represented by the statement and is, of course and as with other means of ground support, dependent upon local conditions, application specifics, thickness of TSL, gauge of wire mesh, etc. Notwithstanding that, the statement as published is maintained to be accurate.”

Further comment and contributions are welcomed.